Note-I
am sorry for the strange formatting and font color in my previous posts. I have tried to correct them with little
success. My technical incompetence is a
source of not a little self-loathing
which I struggle to transcend. I am
relying on your kind patience.
Day 15 and 16 (Memorial
Day) Harrison, Idaho to Cataldo, Idaho
“If we are to love our neighbors, before doing anything else we must see
our neighbors. With our imagination as
well as our eyes, that is to say like artists, we must see not just their faces
bot the life behind and within their faces. Here it is love that is the frame
we them in.
-Frederick Buechner
I remained in Harrison well into the afternoon. I am grateful to the Harrison Community
church for the space and internet access which allowed me to write and to plan
the next few weeks. The afternoon gave
me an opportunity to chat with several people who have been attracted to
Idaho. There is a rugged individualism
which defines this beautiful place. Most
of the people with whom I have spoken value an independence from commercial and
political interests which would like to capitalize on their lives. I have witnessed great kindness and support
for those who in need of assistance (including me).
Before leaving the East Coast I re-read
Reinhold Neibuhr’s book The Irony of
American History. Though the book was written 70 years ago it describes
beautifully many of the forces which define our current century. Neihbuhr maintains (and here I summarize
much) that those who define themselves as “conservative” have a high view of
human nature. Such persons believe that
if you remove external behavioral constraints most of us will be ruled by our
better angels. The invisible hand, which
Adam Smith governs a healthy economy, is consistent with Neihbuhr.
On the other hand, self described “liberals” have a very low view of human
nature. Such persons believe that in the
absence of behavioral constraints we will destroy ourselves. One’s life experience and historical context
will shape how we view the human condition.
My formative years were shaped by segregation, Viet Nam, and
Watergate. It has become hard for many
in my generation to trust those in authority.
Over and against this, I have enjoyed the support and encouragement of
loving parents and an economically stable childhood. I have received an excellent education (paid
for by others) and have been edified by the praise and encouragement of
educators. Several times in my life authoritative
persons have told me “Well done, good and faithful servant” (though I always
question their analysis). It is also
clear to me that I am a beneficiary of historic injustices. My belief in the fundamental goodness of
human nature is tempered by the many dear people in my life who have scarred by
the cruelty of others and the indifference of society in general.
I sense that a polarizing force at work
through our media and social movements is that people are made to feel ashamed for
trying to articulate their hopes and their values. The anger many conservative persons have with
“political correctness” is that we now live in an environment where we are
expelled from the conversation if we utter views which make others feel
uncomfortable. We now live in an environment where it is
dangerous to articulate your deep held values for fear of being judged and
rejected from public conversation. Many
of us feel like we are walking on eggs and dare not speak the concerns of our
heart lest we are expelled from the conversation. This tragedy often causes us to seek the
safety of ideological echo chambers where we find emotional support through our
confirmation bias. It requires courage
to publicly state our convictions and our doubts with both honesty and
humility.
I rode along the Trail of the Coeur d’Alene
from Harrison heading east. The bike
trail is paved (which is good for my spokes and my back) and beautiful. I rode the Coeur D’Alene River and beyond the
sound of traffic. I spotted a moose
cooling off in the in the river indifferent to my gawking. There was still snow on the mountain peaks
which gave the warm air a unique kind of beauty.
I camped in Cataldo (there are no other
housing options). The mosquitoes were
fierce, so I dove into my tent as the sun was setting and had an early night. When I struggled out early the next morning
there were two gentlemen sipping on coffee.
They invited me to join me in a cup of local coffee enhanced with
shitake mushrooms. They introduced themselves
as Ron and Shane and they spend a large portion of the year in this campground. I discovered there was a community of folks
who call the campground home.
They
were welcoming of me and seemed impressed with my bike pilgrimage. We spoke of the state of the country and the
breakdown of civility. We shared our
frustration over “news” sh which programs presented solely the purpose of
making people feel anger and fear. We
discussed how much of what passes for news is an attempt to make the audience
feel virtuous about hating someone.
Among the topics discussed was the gun
culture in Idaho. They both carry guns regularly
as do the other people in the campground.
When I inquired as to why, they shared their belief that responsible gun
ownership was instrumental in becoming a more civil society. In our conversation they stated their belief guns
are the last resort in a conflict. All
citizens need to develop the discipline to effectively use proportional means
of responding to adversarial situations.
They shared that it is prudent to develop constructive communication
skills as the first response to adversarial overtures. It is also necessary that one develop the
ability to use non-lethal force if attacked by an unarmed person. The universal acceptance of these rules of
engagement, they maintain, adds to our civility. They both have a very high view of goodness
of the average person.
I found no anger or fear in their
explanation. Their kindness and
willingness to speak with me surprised me.
We chatted for over an hour.
Though I would never own a gun, and I feel anxious being among people
who do, I did find merit in their argument.
They shared that they would find it natural
to wear a concealed weapon in church.
When I pressed them on why would someone do such a thing, they responded
by asking me “why wouldn’t you?” I was
so surprised by the question that I was not able to quickly with an
answer. On my bike trip for the rest of
the day and answer came to me.
One of the names we give to a church
building is “sanctuary”. A sanctuary, by
definition, is a place where no weapons are allowed. We lay our weapons down at the door as we
enter into such a space. We can pick
them up as we leave, but we are to enter a sanctuary unarmed. This applies not only to guns and swords, but
also to language of sarcasm and contempt.
There are many weapons which serve us in our lives. The political leverage, economic pressure,
social power are all weapons we also leave at the door. We enter naked and vulnerable. This requires great courage. Methinks we are in great need of having more sanctuary
space where we can articulate our dreams and values with hope, humility,
intellectual curiosity, and love. In the
sanctuary there are no television cameras or spin doctors. In the sanctuary we are not rendered winners
or losers. In the sanctuary, we become
more human and see with frightening clarity that every human being is a child
of God.
Perhaps I express a naiveté rooted in my
secure upbringing. I have never
personally experienced a dangerous situation which I would be rendered safe by
the introduction of firearms. I can
understand how those scarred by unpredicted violence might respond differently.
Shane asked if he could pray with me as I
was departing Cataldo to head for Kellogg.
I gladly agreed and said that he and Ron would be reading this blog
post. I do hope that I have represented
them fairly. Today will be a shorter
ride which allows me to take in the beauty of the scenery without feeling so
annoyed with my bodily limitations.
No comments:
Post a Comment